The question of whether whether children should always follow their parents' advice is widely debated in modern society. While parental experience can be a powerful safeguard against impulsive choices, I am convinced that authority should gradually give way to guided autonomy.
The most compelling reason is that parents can offer historical memory and emotional concern that children do not yet possess. This matters because a teenager choosing subjects may benefit from parents who understand both ability and future cost. Moreover, respectful dialogue teaches children how to weigh evidence before acting. These effects can continue to influence individuals and communities beyond the immediate situation.
Admittedly, unquestioning obedience can weaken self-trust and produce dependency. Yet this weakness can be reduced if parents frame advice as reasoning rather than command. Furthermore, a balanced approach would allow children to absorb family wisdom while owning the final decision when appropriate.
On balance, parental advice should be influential but not absolute. Provided that those rules are consistently enforced, this approach offers a stronger and more sustainable answer to the issue.