It is often argued that whether university education should be free. Although there are understandable reasons why some people support it, I believe that it is useful only if the downsides are limited.
A major reason is that free tuition can widen access and reduce social inequality. In practical terms, talented students from poorer families could attend university without fear of debt. This can lead to better outcomes for individuals and society. In addition, it can also create broader social benefits.
Nevertheless, the disadvantages should not be ignored. public funding may be stretched and students may value education less if it is free. Another concern is that it can also place new pressure on people and institutions. These problems may reduce the value of the policy or behaviour if no safeguards are provided.
For these reasons, I would argue that the best answer is a balanced one. governments should subsidise tuition while keeping some shared responsibility.